<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DDC/LCC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shinylib.com/2008/02/27/ddclcc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shinylib.com/2008/02/27/ddclcc/</link>
	<description>the shiny librarian</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 12:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: metaflippant</title>
		<link>http://shinylib.com/2008/02/27/ddclcc/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>metaflippant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shinylib.com/blog/2008/02/27/ddclcc/#comment-11</guid>
		<description>I believe that Dewey is our future.  Teach them well . . . yadda

Seriously though, LC is whack.  Wasn't it designed for a specific library?  It's for a place, not a classification scheme.

I've worked with both, and the only thing good about LC is that religion is in the BS section.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe that Dewey is our future.  Teach them well . . . yadda</p>
<p>Seriously though, LC is whack.  Wasn&#8217;t it designed for a specific library?  It&#8217;s for a place, not a classification scheme.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve worked with both, and the only thing good about LC is that religion is in the BS section.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
