<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>shinylib &#187; virtual reference</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shinylib.com/category/reference/virtual-reference-reference/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shinylib.com</link>
	<description>the shiny librarian</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 02:09:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Chat reference: live and pornographic</title>
		<link>http://shinylib.com/2009/06/22/chat-reference-live-and-pornographic/</link>
		<comments>http://shinylib.com/2009/06/22/chat-reference-live-and-pornographic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 02:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shinylib</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[shiny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtual reference]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shinylib.com/?p=406</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow. I am beyond excited. I just logged in to the admin account and reviewed our first day of chat transcripts. We had 5 interactions, of which 3 were actual attempts to chat with us. One was someone testing and the last was a porn spam. Given that it&#8217;s the first day of summer term [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. I am beyond excited. I just logged in to the admin account and reviewed our first day of chat transcripts.</p>
<p>We had 5 interactions, of which 3 were actual attempts to chat with us. One was someone testing and the last was a porn spam. Given that it&#8217;s the first day of summer term I am actually surprised there were 3 actual attempts to chat with us. We weren&#8217;t able to connect with everyone and that&#8217;s fine—sometimes yer gonna miss us. I&#8217;m just so excited that we&#8217;re actually doing this, pushing forward.</p>
<p>I am sorry for one of my librarians, who reported following the link and inadvertently viewing a few pics. I guess we&#8217;ll have to do some work on suggested practices with regard to receiving links via chat. I was highly amused at her response to the offending robot: &#8220;That&#8217;s not an appropriate question for our chat service.&#8221; She is made of win, that one!</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a pretty awesome feeling to log in to admin and see records that aren&#8217;t just you chatting with yourself in 3 different browsers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shinylib.com/2009/06/22/chat-reference-live-and-pornographic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Movement</title>
		<link>http://shinylib.com/2009/05/29/movement/</link>
		<comments>http://shinylib.com/2009/05/29/movement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 15:40:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shinylib</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[virtual reference]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shinylib.com/?p=401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There has been some movement on the chat front. We&#8217;re working toward a compromise on staffing models that allows everyone to feel comfortable&#8230;and still allows me to do an assessment after the first two quarters and adjust staffing as needed based on transaction data. The key to compromise turned out to be the phone. I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There has been some movement on the chat front. We&#8217;re working toward a compromise on staffing models that allows everyone to feel comfortable&#8230;and still allows me to do an assessment after the first two quarters and adjust staffing as needed based on transaction data.</p>
<p>The key to compromise turned out to be the phone. I just got to a point where I couldn&#8217;t understand the intention behind all of the email I was receiving—so I just started calling folks and hashing things out.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think things will be perfect, they never are, but at least we can start making forward-going movements again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shinylib.com/2009/05/29/movement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stress!</title>
		<link>http://shinylib.com/2009/05/27/stress/</link>
		<comments>http://shinylib.com/2009/05/27/stress/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 00:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shinylib</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[pedestrian whinging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtual reference]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shinylib.com/?p=398</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lemme preface this post by saying I dig and respect my colleagues. I&#8217;m about to go on a major rant, but please don&#8217;t think I don&#8217;t value my coworkers. I am frustrated and emotional and they&#8217;re just feeling a bit more like co-irkers than coworkers at the moment. It will pass. If any of my [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lemme preface this post by saying I dig and respect my colleagues. I&#8217;m about to go on a major rant, but please don&#8217;t think I don&#8217;t value my coworkers. I am frustrated and emotional and they&#8217;re just feeling a bit more like co-irkers than coworkers at the moment. It will pass. If any of my colleagues are reading&#8230;well it&#8217;s a free world. Go right ahead, just don&#8217;t get passive aggressive with me in the workplace. We&#8217;re all adults.</p>
<p>As you know from my long-ass-list-of-junk-I&#8217;m-working-on-right-now post, we&#8217;re trying to get our chat reference program off the ground at PCC Library. This means we&#8217;re knee-deep in conversation about how to staff this thing.</p>
<p>I spent months trying to get folks to have a conversation about these things only to be told &#8220;yeah yeah sounds good&#8221; about my proposed ideas. Sure we can staff chat from the reference desk, it&#8217;s just like another phone line, right?</p>
<p>Now that some &#8220;practice&#8221; (I use the term loosely, very loosely) has actually happened, the librarians are deciding that maybe staffing chat from reference is too hard for them. I don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s true at all; they&#8217;re just scared. I&#8217;m really struggling with my boundaries as the web specialist. There&#8217;s a real temptation to say, &#8220;You know what? That lady who signs the paychecks seems to think I have some expertise in this area. That&#8217;s why she made me the web dork librarian. Just do it my way.&#8221; Yeah, that will totally make me friends in my library. Only not.</p>
<p>I sent an email to the librarians asking them to have a little faith in me, in the proposed pilot service, in themselves, and to give it the ole college try for Summer and Fall. I made promises to review transaction data and anecdotal responses at the end of Fall and reevaluate the staffing situation then. Data, data, data I kept saying. Why? Because it&#8217;s wicked easier to get the boss to sign-off on proposed staffing changes (or, eee, possibly dig up a few more hours for us from somewhere) with numbers in hand. We served X students, Y per cent of whom waited more than 60 seconds for a response. Based on on X and Y we should really try Z for Winter and Spring.</p>
<p>I even had some comments from various managers who saw my email and said that it was a very well-written email that made a lot of sense. So why did I get back what boils down to a &#8220;hellz no&#8221; from one of our librarians?</p>
<p>I get that things felt scary during practice (when you didn&#8217;t even have real patrons yet) but I also know that some of the librarians didn&#8217;t actually practice. Of their own admission, whenever a triage situation arose, they just dumped their pretend chat patron. &#8220;Oh, someone&#8217;s here, gotta go.&#8221; Well, that&#8217;s not stretching your skills and abilities at all, now is it? You can&#8217;t get better at typing &#8220;just a minute please, I have someone on the phone. If you need to go make sure to leave your email and I will follow up with you there,&#8221; if you&#8217;re not actually doing that.</p>
<p>So I&#8217;m super frustrated. The counter-proposal from the librarians is to staff reference from shifts in their offices. Remember this is a community college, not some fancy-pants university library. We don&#8217;t have the luxury of office hours and pretty much all of our time not spent teaching and manning the desk is spent in meetings or prepping for eleventy-nine <em>other </em>things. So this alleged time in the office doesn&#8217;t even exist. To propose that non-existent office time should be used to staff chat is not especially feasible.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s also the issue of inequity between campuses. Everyone is stretched thin and doing more with less. For some reason (dates back to before I was here) our librarians really get off on finger-pointing and insisting that things were better before one campus stole the other campus&#8217; part-time librarian hours. At the campus I work for, we&#8217;re generally pretty sure that we&#8217;re getting the shaft in this battle, but we&#8217;re over it. There&#8217;s a perception that we have more hours of librarian allotted to us, so we must have it easier. We also see more students, open reference an hour earlier, and often teach WAY more classes&#8230;but hey, whatevs.</p>
<p>So I have a lot of fears that this magical librarian-in-an-office solution will really turn into &#8220;why don&#8217;t you guys do it, you have more librarians&#8221;. Which will then boil down to, &#8220;Hey Allie can do it all the time. She types more quickly and is better at that stuff.&#8221; And I am willing to sell my time. Hour for hour, desk time for chat time—but I don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s what they had in mind.</p>
<p>I have a lot more I could say on this, but I&#8217;m just getting myself irate while at reference. Egad, I can answer questions, the phone, chat, AND write blog posts at the same time. Maybe I <em>am</em> a freaking genius.</p>
<p>&lt;/vitriol&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shinylib.com/2009/05/27/stress/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
